Table 4

Comparison of patients with perfect ASPECT score with those with basal ganglia (subcortical) core infarcts

N (N=114)Perfect (ASPECTS 10) (N=49) N (%)Subcortical (N=65*)N (%)p Value†
mRS 90 days1060.7055
 07 (15.6)9 (14.8)
 110 (22.2)8 (13.1)
 24 (8.9)6 (9.8)
 38 (17.8)9 (14.8)
 48 (17.8)11 (18.0)
 51 (2.2)6 (9.8)
 67 (15.6)12 (19.7)
Traditional dichotomy (90 days)1060.3547
 mRS 0–221 (46.7)23 (37.7)
 mRS 3–624 (53.3)38 (62.3)
Alternative dichotomy (90 days)1060.1653
 mRS 5–68 (17.8)18 (29.5)
 mRS 0–437 (82.2)43 (70.5)
Death (mRS=6)1060.5850
 Yes7 (15.6)12 (19.7)
 No38 (84.4)49 (80.3)
Post-TICI flow1100.1553
 TICI 0–2A7 (15.2)17 (26.6)
 TICI 2B–339 (84.8)47 (73.4)
Hemorrhage1140.0429
 Yes4 (8.2)15 (23.1)
 No45 (91.8)50 (76.9)
Side1110.3127
 Left29 (60.4)32 (50.8)
 Right19 (39.6)31 (49.2)
  • *Note that 36 patients in the subcortical category also had cortical core infarcts.

  • †Significant differences are shown in bold.

  • mRS, modified Rankin scale; TICI, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia.