Author | Year | Device | No of patients | Recanalization rate (%)* | Good outcome (%)† | Mortality (%)‡ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mayer15 | 2005 | Waterjet | 12 | 75§ | 33 | 42 |
Lutsep16 | 2008 | Merci | 27 | 78 | 41 | 44 |
Espinosa de Rueda17 | 2013 | Solitaire | 18 | 94 | 50 | 22 |
Mordasini18 | 2013 | Solitaire | 14 | 100 | 29 | 36 |
Mourand19 | 2014 | Solitaire | 31 | 74 | 35 | 32 |
Baek20 | 2014 | Solitaire | 25 | 84 | 48 | 12 |
Möhlenbruch21 | 2014 | Solitaire/Revive | 24 | 75 | 33 | 29 |
Espinosa de Rueda22 | 2013 | Solitaire/Trevo | 18 | 94 | 50 | 22 |
Present study | Solitaire | 13 | 85 | 39 | 46 | |
Penumbra | 18 | 100 | 44 | 39 | ||
Overall | 31 | 94 | 42 | 42 |
*The proportion of patients with TICI grade >2b.
†The proportion of patients with mRS scores of 0, 1, and 2 at 3 months.
‡The proportion of patients with an mRS score of 6 at 3 months.
§The study used TIMI grading. The number is the proportion of patients with TIMI grade >2.
mRS, modified Rankin Scale; TICI, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction; Year, year of publication.