Results of in vitro thrombectomies
| Device | Size | Large white clot | Medium white clot | Small white clot | % | Large red clot | Medium red clot | Small red clot | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevo PV | 4–20 | 0/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 33 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 80 |
| 3–20 | 0/5 | 1/5 | 2/5 | 20 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 60 | |
| Eric | 3–20 | 0/5 | 1/5 | 2/5 | 20 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 53 |
| 4–24 | 0/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 33 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 60 | |
| 6–44 | 0/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 40 | 2/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 73 | |
| Embotrap | 5–21 | 1/5* | 2/5 | 3/5 | 40 | 3/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 80 |
| Separator 3D | 4.5–26 | 0/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 26 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 46 |
| Revive | 4.5–22 | 1/5* | 2/5 | 3/5 | 40 | 3/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 80 |
| Mindframe | 3–23 | 0/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 26 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 | 66 |
| Solitaire FR | 4–20 | 0/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 40 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 93‡ |
| 6–30 | 1/5* | 3/5 | 4/5 | 53 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 93‡ | |
| Preset | 4–20 | 0/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 46 | 4/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 93‡ |
| 6–30 | 2/5* | 3/5 | 4/5 | 60† | 5/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 100§ | |
| Preset LT | 3–20 | 0/5 | 1/5 | 2/5 | 20 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 53 |
| 4–20 | 0/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 26 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 60 | |
| Catch | 3–15 | 0/5 | 1/5 | 2/5 | 20 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 53 |
| 4–20 | 1/5* | 1/5 | 2/5 | 26 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 60 | |
| 6–30 | 1/5* | 3/5 | 4/5 | 53 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 93‡ |
*Minimal clot displacement.
†The rate of white clot removal found for Preset 6–30 was significantly higher than the rates for Catch 3–15, Preset LT 3–20, Eric 3–20, and Trevo 3–20 (60% vs 20%; p=0.031).
‡The rate of red clot removal found for Solitaire 4–20/6–30, Preset 4–20, and Catch 6–30 was significantly higher than the rates for Separator 3D, Eric 3–20, Preset LT 3–20, and Catch 3–15 (93% vs 46%; p=0.016 or 93% vs 53%; p=0.031).
§The rate of red clot removal found for Preset 6–30 was significantly higher than the rates for Separator 3D (100% vs 46%; p=0.008), Eric 3–20, Preset LT 3–20, Catch 3–15 (100% vs 53%; p=0.016), Trevo 3–20, and Eric 4–24 (100% vs 60%; p=0.031).