Table 1

ECG testing metrics

Lead author, year	ECG interpretation	Sensitivity	Specificity	Positive predictive value	Comment
Menown, et al42 2000	Human (attending cardiologist)	68.6%	81.2%	58.9%
Elko, et al⁴³ 1993	Computerized (GE Marquette 12SL Program)	72%–78%	86%–89%	NP	Used deterministic testing to identify ECG criteria associated with AMI
Clark, et al44 2010	Computerized (University of Glasgow Program)	78%	94%	87%	Pre-hospital setting
	Computerized (LIFEPAK 12 Program)	78%	91%	81%	Pre-hospital setting
	Human (attending cardiologist)	85%	90%	81%	Pre-hospital setting
de Champlain, et al45 2014	Computerized (GE Marquette 12SL Program)	69.2%	98.9%	74.0%	Estimations made using Bayesian modeling Pre-hospital setting
Youngquist, et al46 2007	Computerized (GE Marquette 12SL Program)	NP	NP	66%	Estimations made using Bayesian modeling Pre-hospital setting
Bosson, et al47 2017	Computerized (LIFEPAK 15 Program)	92.8%	98.7%	51.0%	Pre-hospital setting

NP, not presented