Patient selection for diagnostic catheter angiography |
Imaging based selection |
It is reasonable to use non-invasive venous imaging as a screening tool to determine candidacy It is reasonable to suggest that IIH patients without previous imaging studies or with studies demonstrating no evidence of sinus stenosis undergo diagnostic venography regardless
| Moderate Weak |
Medically refractory symptoms |
| Moderate |
Intracranial pressure |
It is reasonable to perform venography on patients with intracranial pressures greater than 25 cm H2O It is reasonable to perform venography on patients in select cases where pressures are below 25 cm H2O
| Moderate Weak |
Body Mass Index |
| Weak |
Angiography procedural considerations |
Manometry |
Venography should be performed to assess candidacy for treatment prior to stenting A pressure gradient of 8 mmHg or higher should be present when selecting candidacy for stenting A pressure gradient threshold of 4–7 mmHg may show benefit in select cases
| Strong Moderate Weak |
Arteriography |
| Moderate |
Anesthesia choice |
| Moderate |
Microcatheter |
| Weak |
Stenting procedural considerations |
Stent |
| Weak |
Unilateral vs bilateral stenting |
| Weak |
Number of stents |
| Weak |
Antiplatelet agents |
Antiplatelet agents should be administered prior to stenting and in the follow-up period for at least 3–6 months following stenting There are no data to support inferiority of single antiplatelet agents over dual antiplatelet agents, although thromboembolic complications have been reported with aspirin use only
| Strong Weak |
Post-stent manometry |
| Strong |
Consideration of retreatment |
|
| Strong |