Table 2

Imaging characteristics

CharacteristicsAll patientsNew DWI lesions after CASNo DWI lesions after CASP value
100% (110/110)7.3% (8/110)92.7% (102/110)
Degree of stenosis %, median (range)80 (70–90)90 (80–90)80 (70–90)0.271
Length of stenosis in mm, median (range)10 (2–30)12 (6–22)10 (2–30)0.208
Ultrasound plaque classification score*0.501
 Gray-Weale 125.2% (27/107)7.4% (2/27)92.6% (25/27)
 Gray-Weale 221.5% (23/107)4.3% (1/23)95.7% (22/23)
 Gray-Weale 329.0% (31/107)12.9% (4/31)87.1% (27/31)
 Gray-Weale 424.3% (26/107)3.8% (1/26)96.2% (25/26)
Carotid plaque morphology*0.306
 Anechoic/hypoechoic25.2% (27/107)7.4% (2/27)92.6% (25/27)
 Heterogeneous, predominantly hypoechoic23.4% (25/107)4.0% (1/25)96.0% (24/25)
 Predominantly hyperechoic51.4% (55/107)9.1% (5/55)90.9% (50/55)
Additional ulceration* 15.9% (17/107)5.9% (1/17)94.1% (16/17)1
MRI preprocedural1
 White matter grading 0–275.5% (83/110)7.2% (6/83)92.8% (77/83)
 White matter grading 3–824.5% (27/110)7.4% (2/27)92.6% (25/27)
MR presence of chronic infarction1
 No chronic infarction78.2% (86/110)8.1% (7/86)91.9% (79/86)
 Chronic infarction21.8% (24/110)4.2% (1/24)95.8% (23/24)
MR presence of fresh ischemic lesion preprocedural30% (33/110)9.1% (3/33)90.9% (30/33)0.204
  • *Ultrasound was not performed in three patients.

  • CAS, carotid artery stenting.