Table 2

Comparison between stent assisted coiling and non-stent assisted coiling for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms

AuthorGroupAneurysm numberAge (years)Women (n (%))Technical success rate (%)Aneurysm size (mm)Hunt–Hess gradeFisher I/II (%)Mean clinical/angiographic follow-up (months)
Cai13 SAC6556.649 (75.4)1005.1±2.2Grade 1– 3:6021 (32.3)6/14.6
Non-SAC3256.522 (68.8)94.105.6±2.2Grade 1– 3:3216 (50.0)6/14.6
Fan16 SAC6353.729 (46.0)98.406.2NR5 (7.3)25.7/11.0
Non-SAC15953.979 (49.6)99.405.2NR16 (10.1)35.6/16.5
HyunSAC555640 (72.7)90.10NRGrade 1– 3:44NRNR
Non-SAC39454.9227 (57.6)95.90NRGrade 1– 3:323NRNR
LiuSAC11357.0*79 (69.9)NRNRGrade 1– 2:60NR28/7.5
Non-SAC16656.0*99 (59.6)NRNRGrade 1– 2:82NR28/7.5
RohanSAC4465.638 (86.4)NR8.3Grade 1– 2:13NR7.4
Non-SAC4056.532 (80)NR6.7Grade 1– 2:18NR7.4
Yang19 SAC5856.437 (63.8)NR8.4Grade 1– 2:33NR11.2/7.8
Non-SAC11555.764 (55.7)NR5.5Grade 1– 2:35NR11.2/7.8
ZhaoSAC2356.79 (39.1)NR6.3NR2 (8.7)12/NR
Non-SAC10854.252 (48.1)NR5.7NR29 (26.9)12/NR
Zuo18 SAC13358.193 (69.9)1005.5Grade 1–3: 120NR36.0/13.0
Non-SAC28956.2182 (63.0)1005Grade 1– 3:260NR36.0/13.0
  • *Median age.

  • NR, not reported; SAC, stent assisted coiling.