Table 2

Comparison of transradial with transfemoral approaches for stroke mechanical thrombectomy

ApproachStudyPatients MT attemptedMean age (years)FemaleRight lateralityAnterior circulationPosterior circulationStent retrieverADAPTSolumbraBalloon guideFailure to reach targetSuccessful recanalizationFirst passAccess-site complication
TransradialKhanna et al 202014 5272.9292544718627N/AN/A48N/A1
Phillips et al 202015 1307464N/A1300Unclear54UnclearN/AN/A123690
Chen et al 201913 1879.911N/A180UnclearUnclearUnclear6N/A16100
Maud et al 201918 1077.92N/A010N/AN/AN/A0N/A860
Our study937153518211375430474421
Total 303 73.4 159 (52.5%) 76 (52.4%) 274 (90.4%) 28 (9.24%) 55 (37.9%) 65 (23.6%) 70 (48.3%) 6 (4.96%) 4 (4.30%) 269 (88.8%) 127 (50.6%) 2 (0.66%)
TransfemoralKhanna et al 202014 5269.5332448138113N/AN/A49N/A6
Phillips et al 202015 24576126N/A2450Unclear77UnclearN/AN/A23113616
Chen et al 201913 3377.523N/A330UnclearUnclearUnclear31N/A29180
Maud et al 201918 1055.24N/A010N/AN/AN/A4N/A1070
Our study12969.169721209162192664118655
Total 469 73 255 (54.4%) 96 (53.0%) 446 (95.1%) 20 (4.26%) 54 (29.8%) 109 (25.6%) 95 (52.5%) 101 (58.7%) 4 (3.10%) 93.2% 226 (54.2%) 27 (5.76%)
  • Numerators and denominators for each variable were derived from the studies that reported those variables.

  • .ADAPT, a direct aspiration first pass technique; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; N/A, not applicable.;