Summary of PICO questions, evidence-based recommendations, and expert consensus statements
Topic/PICO question | Evidence-based recommendation | Expert consensus statement |
Mothership
PICO 1: For large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (≤4.5 hours of symptom onset) patients directly admitted to a thrombectomy-capable center and eligible for both treatments, does mechanical thrombectomy alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy lead to:
| For patients directly admitted to a thrombectomy-capable center for an acute ischemic stroke (≤4.5 hours of symptom onset) with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and who are eligible for both treatments, we recommend intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy over mechanical thrombectomy alone. Both treatments should be performed as early as possible after hospital arrival. Mechanical thrombectomy should not prevent the initiation of intravenous thrombolysis and intravenous thrombolysis should not delay mechanical thrombectomy. Quality of evidence: Moderate ⊕⊕⊕ Strength of recommendation: Strong ↑↑ | For patients directly admitted to a thrombectomy-capable center within 4.5 hours of symptom recognition after wake-up ischemic stroke caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, we suggest intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy over mechanical thrombectomy alone in selected patients. The selection criteria for IVT and MT for patients with wake-up stroke are detailed in the corresponding European Guidelines.5 23 Notably, eligibility imaging criteria for IVT include DWI-FLAIR mismatch or perfusion core/penumbra mismatch*. *Perfusion core/penumbra mismatch:
**rCBF <30% (CT perfusion) or ADC <620 µm2/s (diffusion MRI) †Tmax >6 s (perfusion CT or perfusion MRI) |
Drip-and-ship
PICO 2: For large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (≤4.5 hours of symptom onset) patients admitted to a non-thrombectomy-capable center and eligible for both treatments, does mechanical thrombectomy alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy lead to:
| For patients admitted to a non-thrombectomy-capable center for an acute ischemic stroke (≤4.5 hours of symptom onset) with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and who are eligible for both treatments, we recommend intravenous thrombolysis followed by rapid transfer to a center with thrombectomy facilities over omitting intravenous thrombolysis and transfer to a center with thrombectomy facilities. Intravenous thrombolysis should not delay the transfer to a center with thrombectomy facilities. Quality of evidence: Low ⊕⊕ Strength of recommendation: Strong ↑↑ | For patients admitted to a non-thrombectomy-capable center within 4.5 hours of symptom recognition after wake-up ischemic stroke caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, we suggest intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy over mechanical thrombectomy alone in selected patients. The selected criteria for IVT and MT for patients with wake-up stroke are detailed in the corresponding European guidelines.5 23 Notably, eligibility imaging criteria for IVT include DWI-FLAIR mismatch or perfusion core/penumbra mismatch*. *Perfusion core/penumbra mismatch:
**rCBF <30% (CT perfusion) or ADC <620 µm2/s (diffusion MRI) †Tmax >6 s (perfusion CT or perfusion MRI) |
ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient ; CT, computed tomography; DWI-FLAIR, diffusion weighted imaging-fluid attenuated inversion recovery; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; PICO, Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome; rCBF, relative cerebral blood flow; sICH, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.