Table 1

Risk factors for unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with basilar artery trunk aneurysms

Clinical outcomesUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
Favorable (n=92)Unfavorable (n=19)P valueOR95% CIP value
Age (years)57±1163±100.0371.091.02 to 1.170.008
Women24 (21.6)6 (5.4)0.624
Smoking41 (36.9)6 (5.4)0.297
Diabetes6 (5.4)4 (3.6)0.066
Hypertension65 (5.85)16 (14.4)0.226
Hyperlipidemia28 (25.2)5 (4.5)0.721
Ischemic stroke25 (22.5)7 (6.3)0.397
Incidental finding20 (18.0)2 (1.8)0.355
Ruptured aneurysm20 (18.0)6 (5.4)0.357
HH grade (IV–V)2 (1.8)3 (2.7)0.03530.672.39 to 393.190.009
mFS score (III–IV)14 (12.6)6 (5.4)0.107
Sac aneurysm56 (50.5)13 (11.7)0.537
Circumferential aneurysm31 (27.9)8 (7.2)0.485
Coexisting BA stenosis15 (13.8)1 (0.9)0.298
AICA involvement11 (9.9)8 (7.2)0.001
Multiple stents32 (28.8)7 (6.3)0.864
Flow diversion11 (9.9)3 (2.7)0.705
Complete aneurysm obliteration49 (44.1)9 (8.1)0.640
Infarction complication19 (17.1)10 (9.0)0.004
Hemorrhage complication1 (0.9)3 (2.7)0.01633.981.12 to 1031.370.043
Hydrocephalus requiring shunting2 (1.8)3 (2.7)0.035
Aneurysm size (mm)9.2±5.815.2±7.70.0041.221.10 to 1.34<0.001
Lesion length (mm)8.3±6.013.7±7.80.001
  • Variables are expressed as mean±SD or number (%) of patients.

  • AICA, anterior inferior cerebellar artery; BA, basilar artery; HH, Hunt and Hess; mFS, modified Fisher scale.