Skip to main content
Log in

Structural limitations of currently available microcatheters and coils for endovascular coiling of very small aneurysms

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Coil embolization for very small aneurysms (<3 mm in maximum diameter) has been considered a technically challenging method due to increased risk of potential aneurysm perforation during the procedure. We present our observations about the structural limitations of eight types of microcatheters and three types of detachable coils, and technical pitfalls in the coiling of very small aneurysms.

Methods

The structures of each type of microcatheter and coil were carefully evaluated under a stereoscopic microscope. The evaluation the microcatheters was focused on the distance between the distal end of the distal marker and the tip of microcatheter. The evaluation of the coils was focused on the length of the detachment zone.

Results

With markers of the coil delivery systems and microcatheters aligned under fluoroscopic visualization according to the manufacturers’ recommendations, the stiff detachment zones protruded approximately 0.2–1 mm from the microcatheter tip. The lengths of the detachment zone, which is known to be a stiff segment, of the currently available coils were approximately 0.5–0.8 mm. The distance between the distal end of the distal markers of the microcatheters and the detachment zone of the coil ranged from approximately 1.2 to 2.8 mm.

Conclusion

To prevent rupture of very small aneurysms during coiling, the distal marker of the selected microcatheter should be carefully located near the aneurysm neck, considering all the structural characteristic of the currently available coils and microcatheters. Refinement of currently available devices may be essential to achieve safer coiling of very small aneurysms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raymond J, Roy D (1997) Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 41:1235–1246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ricolfi F, Le Guerinel C, Blustajn J, Combes C, Brugieres P, Melon E et al (1998) Rupture during treatment of recently ruptured aneurysms with Guglielmi electrodetachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1653–1658

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sluzewski M, Bosch JA, van Rooij WJ, Nijssen PC, Wijnalda D (2001) Rupture of intracranial aneurysms during treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: incidence, outcome and risk factors. J Neurosurg 94:238–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van Rooij W, Sluzewski M, Beute G, Nijssen P (2006) Procedural complications of coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: incidence and risk factors in a consecutive series of 681 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1498–1501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh V, Gress DR, Higashida RT, Dowd CF, Halbach VV, Johnston SC (2002) The learning curve for coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:768–771

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suzuki S, Kurata A, Ohmomo T, Sagiuchi T, Niki J, Yamada M et al (2006) Endovascular surgery for very small ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Technical note. J Neurosurg 105:777–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G (1991) Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 75:8–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwon OK, Han MH (2002) Marker alignment for Guglielmi detachable coil embolization: practical considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:1276–1283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abe T, Hirohata M, Tanaka N, Uchiyama Y, Fujimoto K, Fujimura N et al (2004) Distal-tip shape-consistency testing of steam-shaped microcatheters suitable for cerebral aneurysm coil placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1058–1061

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Matsumoto S, Okahara M, Tanoue S, Sagara Y et al (2005) Shapability, memory, and luminal changes in microcatheters after steam shaping: a comparison of 11 different microcatheters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2610–2616

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by research grants from the Daewoo Medical Foundation.

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Sam Shin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, Y.C., Kim, B.M., Shin, Y.S. et al. Structural limitations of currently available microcatheters and coils for endovascular coiling of very small aneurysms. Neuroradiology 50, 423–427 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-008-0365-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-008-0365-y

Keywords

Navigation