References
Briganti F, Napoli M, Tortora F, Solari D, Bergui M et al (2012) Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications—a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology. doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1047-3
Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R, International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysms Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet 26(360 (9342)):1267–74
Johnston SC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, Lawton MT, Duckwiler GR, Gress DR (2008) Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment 421 of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 39(1):120–125
Pierot L, Cognard C, Spelle L, Moret J (2012) Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: critical review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(1):12–15
Conflict of interest
FB serves as proctor for Covidien-ev3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This is the original author's response to the letter to the editor in regard to the initial Briganti letter to the editor (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1066-0)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Briganti, F. Reply to comment of Dr. W-J van Rooij on: Italian multicenter experience with flow diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications—a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology 54, 1181–1182 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1071-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1071-3