Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety, efficacy, and short-term follow-up of the use of Pipeline™ Embolization Device in small (<2.5mm) cerebral vessels for aneurysm treatment: single institution experience

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Flow diversion is being increasingly used to treat cerebral aneurysms. We present our experience using these stents to treat aneurysms distal to the circle of Willis with parent arteries smaller than 2.5 mm.

Methods

Aneurysms treated with a Pipeline™ Embolization Device in vessels less than 2.5 mm between June 2012 and August 2014 were included. We evaluated risk factors, family history of aneurysms, aneurysm characteristics, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and modified Rankin scale (mRS) on admission and angiography and clinical outcome at discharge, 6 months, and 1 year.

Results

We included seven patients with a mean age of 65 years. The parent vessel size ranged from 1.5 to 2.3 mm; mean 1.9 mm. Location of the aneurysms was as follows: two aneurysms centered along the pericallosal artery (one left, one right), one on the right angular artery, one aneurysm at the anterior communicating artery (ACom), one at the ACom-right A2 anterior cerebral artery (ACA), one at the lenticulostriate artery, and one at the A1-A2 ACA artery. Aneurysms ranged from 1 to 12 mm in diameter. All aneurysms were treated with a single Pipeline™ Embolization Device (PED). No peri- or post-procedural complications or mortality occurred. The patients were discharged with no change in NIHSS or mRS score. Angiographic follow-up was available in six patients. Angiography showed complete aneurysm occlusion in all. NIHSS and mRS remained unchanged at follow-up.

Conclusion

Our preliminary results show that flow diversion technology is an effective and safe therapy for aneurysms located on small cerebral arteries. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate our promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G et al (2013) Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 267(3):858–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yavuz K, Geyik S, Saatci I, Cekirge HS (2014) Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35(3):529–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martinez-Galdamez M, Romance A, Vega P, Vega A, Caniego JL, Paul L, et al (2014) Pipeline endovascular device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms at the level of the circle of Willis and beyond: multicenter experience. J Neurointervent Surg.

  4. Chalouhi N, Zanaty M, Whiting A, Yang S, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D, et al (2015) Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device in 100 small intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1–5

  5. Mitchell B, Momin E, Jou LD, Shaltoni H, Morsi H, Mawad M (2014) Extensive bilateral vertebral artery remodeling following treatment of dissection using pipeline embolic device. J Vasc Interv Neurol 7(5):5–8

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cinar C, Oran I, Bozkaya H, Ozgiray E (2013) Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms with special reference to the flow-diverting strategy. Neuroradiology 55(4):441–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chalouhi N, Zanaty M, Tjoumakaris S, Gonzalez LF, Hasan D, Kung D et al (2014) Treatment of blister-like aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 74(5):527–32, discussion 32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pistocchi S, Blanc R, Bartolini B, Piotin M (2012) Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 43(4):1032–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Amenta PS, Starke RM, Jabbour PM, Tjoumakaris SI, Gonzalez LF, Rosenwasser RH et al (2012) Successful treatment of a traumatic carotid pseudoaneurysm with the Pipeline stent: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 3:160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin LM, Colby GP, Kim JE, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Coon AL (2013) Immediate and follow-up results for 44 consecutive cases of small (<10 mm) internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device. Surg Neurol Int 4:114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin AR, Cruz JP, O’Kelly C, Kelly M, Spears J, Marotta TR (2014) Small pipes: preliminary experience with 3-mm or smaller pipeline flow-diverting stents for aneurysm repair prior to regulatory approval. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.

  12. Turk AS, Niemann DB, Ahmed A, Aagaard-Kienitz B (2007) Use of self-expanding stents in distal small cerebral vessels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(3):533–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, Brunel H, Pierot L, Gabrillargues J et al (2012) Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(6):1150–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chalouhi N, Zanaty M, Whiting A, Yang S, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D et al (2015) Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device in 100 small intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 122(6):1498–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Yang S, Bovenzi CD, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D et al (2014) Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke 45(1):54–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wakhloo AK, Lylyk P, de Vries J, Taschner C, Lundquist J, Biondi A et al (2015) Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(1):98–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2013) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 44(2):442–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clarencon F, Di Maria F, Gabrieli J, Shotar E, Zeghal C, Nouet A, et al (2015) Flow diverter stents for the treatment of anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: safety and effectiveness. Clin Neuroradiol.

  19. Gawlitza M, Januel AC, Tall P, Bonneville F, Cognard C (2015) Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J Neurointervent Surg.

  20. Saleme S, Iosif C, Ponomarjova S, Mendes G, Camilleri Y, Caire F et al (2014) Flow-diverting stents for intracranial bifurcation aneurysm treatment. Neurosurgery 75(6):623–31, quiz 31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Caroff J, Neki H, Mihalea C, D’Argento F, Abdel Khalek H, Ikka L, et al (2015) Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajit S. Puri.

Ethics declarations

We declare that all human and animal studies have been approved by the Institutional Review Committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that all patients gave informed consent prior to inclusion in this study.

Conflict of interest

ASP consults for Codman Neurovascular and Covidien and has research grants from Stryker Neurovascular and Covidien. AKW consults for Stryker Neurovascular, has a research grant from Philips Healthcare and the Wyss Institute and speaks for the Harvard Postgraduate Course and Miami Cardiovascular Institute. MJG consults for Codman Neurovascular and Stryker Neurovascular and has research grants from the NIH, eV3/Covidien Neurovascular, Codman Neurovascular, Fraunhofer Institute, the Wyss Institute, Philips Healthcare, Stryker Neurovascular, Silk Road and Lazarus-Effect. PK consults for Stryker Neurovascular, Covidien and MicroVention. FC consults for Covidien and Codman Neurovascular.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puri, A.S., Massari, F., Asai, T. et al. Safety, efficacy, and short-term follow-up of the use of Pipeline™ Embolization Device in small (<2.5mm) cerebral vessels for aneurysm treatment: single institution experience. Neuroradiology 58, 267–275 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1630-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1630-5

Keywords

Navigation