Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of Stent Retriever Design and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Flow Model

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In vitro experiments were performed to evaluate the efficacy of mechanical intracranial thrombectomy comparing the newly developed Aperio stent retriever and standard devices for stroke treatment.

Methods

The Aperio (A), with an increased working length of 4 cm and a special cell design for capturing and withholding clots, was compared to three benchmark devices: the Solitaire retrievable stent (B), the Merci X6 (C), and the Merci L5 retriever (D). In a vascular glass model with pulsatile flow, reminiscent of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery, we repeatedly induced occlusion by generating thrombi via a modified Chandler loop system. The numbers of recanalization attempts, peripheral embolizations, and recanalizations at the site of occlusion were recorded during 10 retrieval experiments with each device.

Results

Eleven devices were able to remove the blood clots from the occluded branch. In 34 of 40 experiments, restoration of flow was obtained in 1–3 attempts. The main differences between the study devices were observed in terms of clot withholding and fragmentation during retrieval. Although there was only one fragmentation recorded for device A, disengagement of the whole clot or peripheral embolization of fragments occurred more frequently (5–7 times) with devices B, C, and D.

Conclusion

In a vascular model, the design of device A was best at capturing and withholding thrombi during retrieval. Further study will be necessary to see whether this holds true in clinical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhatia R, Hill MD, Shobha N et al (2010) Low rates of acute recanalization with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in ischemic stroke: real-world experience and a call for action. Stroke 41:2254–2258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith WS, Sung G, Saver J et al (2008) Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke 39:1205–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kulcsar Z, Bonvin C, Pereira VM et al (2010) Penumbra system: a novel mechanical thrombectomy device for large-vessel occlusions in acute stroke. Am J Neuroradiol 31:628–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Becktepe JS, You SJ, Berkefeld J et al (2011) Clinical outcome after mechanical recanalization as mono- or adjunctive therapy in acute stroke: importance of time to recanalization. Cerebrovasc Dis 32:211–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roth C, Papanagiotou P, Behnke S et al (2010) Stent-assisted mechanical recanalization for treatment of acute intracerebral artery occlusions. Stroke 41:2559–2567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fesl G, Patzig M, Holtmannspoetter M et al. (2011) Endovascular mechanical recanalisation after intravenous thrombolysis in acute anterior circulation stroke: the impact of a new temporary stent. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00270-011-0317-5

  7. Castaño C, Dorado L, Guerrero C et al (2010) Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire AB device in large artery occlusions of the anterior circulation: a pilot study. Stroke 41:1836–1840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Machi P, Costalat V, Lobotesis K et al (2012) Solitaire FR thrombectomy system: immediate results in 56 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients. J Neurointerv Surg 4:62–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Loh Y, Jahan R, McArthur DL (2010) Recanalization rates decrease with increasing thrombectomy attempts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:935–939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schreiber SJ, Gottschalk S, Weih M et al (2000) Assessment of blood flow velocity and diameter of the middle cerebral artery during the acetazolamide provocation test by use of transcranial doppler sonography and MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1207–1211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Robbie LA, Young SP, Bennett B, Booth NA (1997) Thrombi formed in a Chandler loop mimic human arterial thrombi in structure and RAI-1 content and distribution. Thromb Haemost 77:510–515

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poole CF (1959) A study of artificial thrombi produced by a modification of Chandler’s method. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 44:377–384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liebig T, Reinartz J, Hannes R (2008) Comparative in vitro study of five mechanical embolectomy systems: effectiveness of clot removal and risk of distal embolization. Neuroradiology 50:43–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mordasini P, Frabetti N, Gralla J (2011) In vivo evaluation of the first dedicated combined flow-restoration and mechanical thrombectomy device in a swine model of acute vessel occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:294–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This work was performed in cooperation between industry and university. FNis employee of Acandis GmbH & Co KG, Pforzheim, Germany, and JB is a member of the scientific advisory board of Acandis. KW and MW have no conflicts of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Berkefeld.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 11 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wenger, K., Nagl, F., Wagner, M. et al. Improvement of Stent Retriever Design and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Flow Model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36, 192–197 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0420-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0420-2

Keywords

Navigation