Skip to main content
Log in

Frequency and predictors of endoleaks and long-term patency after covered stent placement for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre experience

  • Vascular-Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We investigated immediate/late endoleaks and long-term patency following stent-graft placement for treatment of intracranial aneurysms located within the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) or vertebral artery (VA).

Methods

Forty-five aneurysms in 41 patients receiving covered stents in three centres were followed. Outcome measures included aneurysm occlusion rate, endoleaks, late in-stent stenosis rate, clinical improvement, neurological deficiencies and death.

Results

Total aneurysm exclusion was achieved in 69.2% (n = 27), with 30.8% (n = 12) experiencing immediate residual endoleaks. Angiographic follow-up (mean 43.5 ± 14.3 months) revealed that 87.2% (n = 34) were completely occluded with only 12.8% (n = 5) showing residual endoleaks. Predictors of immediate endoleaks in our patient group were stent number (P = 0.023) and stent diameter (P = 0.022), while predictors of late endoleaks in our patient group were stent diameter (P = 0.035) and stent angulation (P = 0.021). Late in-stent stenosis rates were 18.0 ± 13.3 and 29.0 ± 18.5% compared with the period immediately following implantation at 2- and 6-year follow-ups respectively. Smoking (P = 0.017) and stent angulation (P = 0.020) were predictors of late in-stent stenosis.

Conclusion

Treating intracranial aneurysms with Willis stent-grafts has an acceptable immediate and late occlusion rate and long-term stented artery patency rate.

Key Points

Covered stents can be a treatment option for intracranial aneurysms.

Technical success for treating distal ICA and VA aneurysms can reach 97.6%.

However immediate and late endoleaks occur in 30.8 and 12.8% respectively.

The number, diameter and angulation of stents are possible predictors of endoleaks.

Smoking and stent angulation seem to predict late in-stent stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pelz DM, Levy EI, Hopkins LN (2008) Advances in interventional neuroradiology. Stroke 39:268–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wakhloo AK, Lanzino G, Lieber BB et al (1998) Stents for intracranial aneurysms: the beginning of a new endovascular era? Neurosurgery 43:377–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Islak C, Kocer N (2002) Bare stent-graft technique: a new method of endoluminal vascular reconstruction for the treatment of giant and fusiform aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:1589–1595

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Auyeung KM, Lui WM, Chow LC et al (2003) Massive epistaxis related to petrous carotid artery pseudoaneurysm after radiation therapy: emergency treatment with covered stent in two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1449–1452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saatci I, Cekirge HS, Ozturk MH et al (2004) Treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with a covered stent: experience in 24 patients with mid-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1742–1749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li MH, Zhu YQ, Fang C et al (2008) The feasibility and efficacy of treatment with a Willis covered stent in recurrent intracranial aneurysms after coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:1395–1400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu YQ, Li MH, Fang C et al (2010) Application of the Willis covered stent in the treatment of aneurysm in the cisternal segment of the internal carotid artery: a pilot comparative study with midterm follow-up. J Endovasc Ther 17:55–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li MH, Li YD, Tan HQ et al (2009) Treatment of distal internal carotid artery aneurysm with the Willis covered stent: a prospective pilot study. Radiology 253:470–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grunwald IQ, Kamran M, Corkill RA et al (2012) Simple measurement of aneurysm residual after treatment: the SMART scale for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawaguchi S, Sakaki T, Iwahashi H et al (2006) Effect of carotid artery stenting on ocular circulation and chronic ocular ischemic syndrome. Cerebrovasc Dis 22:402–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hupperts RM, Lodder J, Heuts-van Raak EP et al (1994) Infarcts in the anterior choroidal artery territory. Anatomical distribution, clinical syndromes, presumed pathogenesis and early outcome. Brain 117:825–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang JH, Choi HY, Nam HS et al (2007) Mechanism of infarction involving ipsilateral carotid and posterior cerebral artery territories. Cerebrovasc Dis 24:445–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chuter TA, Faruqi RM, Sawhney R et al (2001) Endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 34:98–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stavropoulos SW, Charagundla SR (2007) Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology 243:641–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoit DA, Schirmer CM, Malek AM (2008) Stent graft treatment of cerebrovascular wall defects: intermediate-term clinical and angiographic results. Neurosurgery 62:ONS380–ONS388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lang J (1983) Clinical anatomy of brainstem vessels. Miles Pharmaceutical, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu YQ, Li MH, Xie J et al (2010) Treatment of carotid siphon aneurysms by use of the Willis stent graft: an angiographic and histopathological study. Eur Radiol 20:1974–1984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher AB, Chien S, Barakat AI et al (2001) Endothelial cellular response to altered shear stress. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 281:L529–L533

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei Z, Costa K, Al-Mehdi AB et al (1999) Simulated ischemia in flow-adapted endothelial cells leads to generation of reactive oxygen species and cell signaling. Circ Res 85:682–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fowkes FG, Housley E, Riemersma RA et al (1992) Smoking, lipids, glucose tolerance, and blood pressure as risk factors for peripheral atherosclerosis compared with ischemic heart disease in the Edinburgh Artery Study. Am J Epidemiol 135:331–340

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Drexel H, Steurer J, Muntwyler J et al (1996) Predictors of the presence and extent of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Circulation 94:II199–II205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W et al (2004) Effect of smoking on restenosis during the first year after lower-limb endovascular interventions. Radiology 231:831–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stayman AN, Nogueira RG, Gupta R (2011) A systematic review of stenting and angioplasty of symptomatic extracranial vertebral artery stenosis. Stroke 42:2212–2216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R et al (2009) Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 64:632–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I et al (2011) The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:34–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Deutschmann HA, Wehrschuetz M, Augustin M et al (2012) Long-term follow-up after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: results from a single center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:481–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC et al (2008) Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 62:1115–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McAuliffe W, Wenderoth JD (2012) Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:487–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M (2010) Perforator infarction after placement of a pipeline flow-diverting stent for an unruptured A1 aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:E43–E44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fiorella D, Hsu D, Woo HH et al (2010) Very late thrombosis of a pipeline embolization device construct: case report. Neurosurgery 67:onsE313–onsE314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hampton T, Walsh D, Tolias C et al (2011) Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg 3:167–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kulcsar Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A et al (2011) Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:20–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81000652), Shanghai Venus Program Funds (No. 11QA1405000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Hua Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, YQ., Li, MH., Lin, F. et al. Frequency and predictors of endoleaks and long-term patency after covered stent placement for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre experience. Eur Radiol 23, 287–297 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2581-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2581-4

Keywords

Navigation