Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the prestige of a journal or a conference? The evaluation of the scientific work of a scientist and the estimation of the quality of a journal or conference has long attracted significant interest, due to the benefits by obtaining an unbiased and fair criterion. Although it appears to be simple, defining a quality metric is not an easy task. To overcome the disadvantages of the present metrics used for ranking scientists and journals, J. E. Hirsch proposed a pioneering metric, the now famous h-index. In this article we demonstrate several inefficiencies of this index and develop a pair of generalizations and effective variants of it to deal with scientist ranking and publication forum ranking. The new citation indices are able to disclose trendsetters in scientific research, as well as researchers that constantly shape their field with their influential work, no matter how old they are. We exhibit the effectiveness and the benefits of the new indices to unfold the full potential of the h-index, with extensive experimental results obtained from the DBLP, a widely known on-line digital library.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Ball, Index aims for fair ranking of scientists — h-index sums up publication record. Nature, 436(7053) (2005) 900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. G. Banks, An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bar-Ilan, h-index for price medalists revisited. ISSI Newsletter 5 (Jan. 2006).

  4. S. J. Barnes, Assessing the value of IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 48(1) (2005) 110–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. D. Batista, M. G. Campiteli, O. Kinouchi, A. S. Martinez, Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1) (2006) 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. A. Bernstein, E. Bertino, A. Heuer, C. J. Jensen, H. Meyer, M. Tamer Ozsu, R. T. Snodgrass, K.-Y. Whang, An apples-to-apples comparison of two database journals. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(4) (2005) 61–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Bharati, P. Tarasewich, Global perceptions of journals publishing e-commerce research. Communications of the ACM, 45(5) (2002) 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Bollen, M. A. Rodriguez, H. Van De Sompel, Journal status, (May 2006), Preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0601030

  9. L. Bornmann, H.-D. Daniel, Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65(3) (2005) 391–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Cronin, L. Meho, Using the H-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9) (2006) 1275–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Egghe, Dynamic h-index: The Hirsch index in function of time. Scientometrics, (2006), To appear.

  13. L. Egghe, Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 131–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, An informetric model for the Hirsch-index. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Elmacioglu, D. Lee, On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(2) (2005) 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178 (1972) 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Glänzel, On the h-index — A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2) (2006) 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. C. Hardgrave, K. A. Walstrom, Forums for MIS scholars. Communications of the ACM, 40(11) (1997) 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46) (2005) 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C. W. Holsapple, H. Johnson, L. E. Manakyan, J. Tanner, Business computing research journals: A normalized citation analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1) (1994) 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Katerattanakul, B. T. Han, S. Hong, Objective quality ranking of computing journals. Communications of the ACM, 46(10) (2003) 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Kelly Rainer, M. D. Miller, Examining differences across journal rankings. Communications of the ACM, 48(2) (2005) 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Kleinberg, Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5) (1999) 604–632.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. L. Liang, h-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Lowry, D. Romans, A. Curtis, Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of information systems journals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(2) (2004) 29–75.

    Google Scholar 

  26. N. A. Mylonopoulos, V. Theoharakis, Global perception of IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 44(9) (2001) 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. A. Nascimento, J. Sander, J. Pound, Analysis of SIGMOD’s co-authorship graph. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32(3) (2003) 8–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. P. Nerur, R. Sikora, G. Mangalaraj, V. Balijepally, Assessing the relative influence of journals in a citation network. Communications of the ACM, 48(11) (2005) 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, T. Winograd, The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web. Technical Report TR-1999-66, Stanford University,1999.

  30. A. F. J. Van Raan, Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3) (2006) 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Rahm, A. Thor, Citation analysis of database publications. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(4) (2005) 48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Rousseau, A case study: Evolution of JASIS’ Hirsch index. Library and Information Science, Jan. 2006. Available at http://eprints.rcils.org/archive/00005430

  33. R. Rousseau, Simple models and the corresponding h and g index. Library and Information Science, Apr. 2006. Available at http://eprints.rcils.org/archive/00006153

  34. G. Saad, Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively. Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 117–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. R. B. Schwartz, M. C. Russo, How to quickly find articles in the top IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 47(2) (2004) 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. A. Sidiropoulos, Y. Manolopoulos, A citation-based system to assist prize awarding. ACM SIGMOD Record, 34(4) (2005) 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Sidiropoulos, Y. Manolopoulos, A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 41(2) (2005) 289–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Sidiropoulos, Y. Manolopoulos, Generalized comparison of graph-based ranking algorithms for publications and authors. Journal for Systems and Software (2006), To appear.

  39. R. Snodgrass, Journal relevance. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32(3) (2003) 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Informatics Department, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece

    Antonis Sidiropoulos, Dimitrios Katsaros & Yannis Manolopoulos

  2. Computer & Communications Engineering Department, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

    Dimitrios Katsaros

Authors
  1. Antonis Sidiropoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dimitrios Katsaros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yannis Manolopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Katsaros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D. & Manolopoulos, Y. Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics 72, 253–280 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1722-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1722-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation