Radiation dose in interventional fluoroscopic procedures

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00046-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Vascular interventional procedures carried out under fluoroscopic guidance often involve high radiation doses. Above certain thresholds, radiation can cause significant damage to the skin including hair loss and severe necrosis. Such damage has been reported by several investigators. Many attempts have been made to quantitate the radiation doses to the skin involved with these procedures, but dosimetry methods are often flawed. To improve the situation better monitoring of radiation doses, fluoroscopist education, and changes in technology and methods are needed.

Introduction

Vascular interventional procedures carried out under fluoroscopic guidance have become an increasingly prominent tool in treatment of vascular and cardiac diseases. These procedures encompass the specialties of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, Peripheral Vascular Radiology and Neurovascular Radiology. The most commonly known type of procedure in this area is probably coronary arterial angioplasty, in which occluded or stenosed coronary arteries are reopened by various means of removal or displacement of arterial plaque. Cardiac arrhythmia is often dealt with by the procedure known as radio frequency cardiac ablation. In this procedure an electrophysiologist applies a radio frequency (RF) heating probe to the muscle wall of the heart while monitoring electrocardiographic signals to determine if tissue providing an anomalous cardiac electrical path is destroyed. Peripheral vascular procedures often involve reopening vessels in arteries other than the coronary arteries, but similar angioplasty methods are used as in the heart. One of the more complicated types of peripheral vascular interventions are the placement of a shunt between the portal and hepatic veins in a compromised liver to stop gastroesophageal bleeding due to venous hypertension. This procedure is known as a transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt (or TIPS) placement. In neurovascular radiology the most delicate fluoroscopically monitored interventional procedure is the blocking or embolization of a malformation in the cerebral vascular system. Typically a small vessel leading to an aneurysm is blocked by placement of a plug made of materials ranging from bits of plastic to glue. Similar embolization procedures are performed in the peripheral vasculature, but the intricacy of the neurovascular system and its variations and the potential for brain damage make the neurological embolization procedure particularly complex.

High radiation doses occur in these procedures due to one or more of the following aspects. The procedures are usually intricate, requiring in some cases many hours of fluoroscopic guidance (e.g., RF ablations). Most of these procedures require high quality, low noise images such as cine' fluorography or digital subtraction angiography to properly see the vessels. They are always performed on patients who have been diagnosed with a severe medical problem for whom few, or no, alternate treatments can be offered. The risks associated with ionizing radiation in these procedures have to be viewed in the context of the potential benefit of the procedure, the likelihood of greater trauma associated with surgery in the brain or heart, and perhaps with immanent death if the procedure is not performed.

For this reason, most physicians that perform such procedures seem to be relatively unconcerned with the long term risks associated with ionizing radiation, such as cancer and genetic effects. However, the potential for deterministic effects such as burns of the skin and loss of hair is of greater concern.

Deterministic effects of radiation are those which require a minimum number of cells to be involved before the effect can be detected. Thus there is a threshold radiation dose below which the effect can not be seen. Additionally, an increase in the dose above the threshold will lead to greater damage. The potential for deterministic effects from the type of procedures described above have been reviewed in detail recently by Wagner et al. (1994). The major organ affected by localized high doses of radiation is the skin. The threshold for radiation damage to skin varies from individual to individual, but is generally estimated to be in the range of two sieverts (Sv). Skin doses in this range can also cause temporary loss of hair. More severe consequences occur at higher doses. At doses of about six sieverts the basal cells of the skin are sufficiently damaged to cause a long term erythema lasting several weeks. Hair loss from doses in this range and above is likely to be permanent. If a sufficient number of basal cells are destroyed the skin will slough off or peel. This dry desquamation typically occurs at around ten sieverts. Desquamation can be delayed after the main erythema effect by a few weeks during which time the erythema appears to be subsiding. At doses above about 18 Sv the destruction of basal cells becomes complete. When desquamation occurs, it is accompanied by oozing of lymphatic fluids. Doses in this range and above lead to severe skin damage. Small regions of destroyed skin, less than about 10 cm diameter, can grow back from the outer edges, but larger lesions generally will require skin transplantation to repair them.

The skin is not the only tissue with a potential for damage from interventional procedures. The eyes are close to the region examined during neurological procedures. The bone near the skin surface, particularly the posterior aspect of the skull also receives a high dose. Cardiac and coronary artery procedures can involve comparatively high exposure of the posterior portions of the lungs.

The threshold dose for causing cataracts in the eye is similar to that of erythema, with a dose of two sieverts leading to sub-clinical cataract induction. Vision impairment is not likely to occur below doses of six sievert to the lens. Bone changes might occur in young patients in whom bone dose exceeds 30 Sv. Although this is a seemingly high number, one has to bear in mind that the relative dose per unit exposure (f-factor) in bone is about four times as high as that for soft tissue at the X-ray energies used for imaging. Pneumonitis induced by radiation requires a rather large area of the lung to be exposed to a dose of about seven sieverts or more.

Section snippets

Radiation dosimetry

To determine the level of deterministic effects such as skin damage it is necessary to know the dose to the skin at several points. Since the principal mechanism for harm to the patient is damage to the skin, and because doses to internal organs can usually be obtained by several methods once skin dose is known, the primary interest to the medical physicist is determination of skin dose, or skin entrance exposure. In general the determination of skin dose is performed by one of two methods,

Reported injuries

Deterministic effects from interventional procedures have been noted and the entry skin dose or related quantities have been estimated. In an analysis of radiation induced skin injuries resulting from therapeutic interventional procedures performed under fluoroscopic guidance reported to the FDA, Shope (1996)cited 26 injuries from reports received between Jan. 1992 and Oct. 1995. Of these, twelve occurred during radio frequency (RF) cardiac ablation procedures, four from coronary angioplasties,

Regulatory efforts

Many members of the radiological community have expressed concern over the radiation dose given to patients during long fluoroscopic procedures. Brody (1992)editorialized that radiation exposure per image for digital cine' was higher by a factor of ten than corresponding 35 mm film cine. He attributed this in part to the higher frame rate and further noted that the trend to higher radiation exposures will be accelerated by the transition to filmless (digital) radiology. Chamberlain (1994)

Conclusion

Injuries to patients undergoing radiological procedures have re-emerged as a problem in the 1990s. New technologies that allow longer exposures at higher dose rates in both fluoroscopy and digital imaging give cause for concern. Increased use of X-ray imaging by physicians who have been lacking in education regarding radiation protection and equipment operation have contributed to the problem.

There is concern within the radiation protection community, but acting on this concern could be

References (61)

  • S.C. Bushong

    Commentary

    AJNR

    (1995)
  • H. Calkins et al.

    Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections

    Circulation

    (1991)
  • Castellano, A., McNeill, J. G., Thorp, N. C., Dance, D. R., Raphael, M. J., 1995. Assessment of organ radiation doses...
  • C.C. Chamberlain

    The reduction of patient dose in interventional radiography

    Health Physics

    (1994)
  • Council of the European Union, 1997. Council Directive 97/43/Euratom June 30, 1997, Official Journal of the European...
  • L.C. Fajardo et al.

    A survey of films for use as dosimeters in interventional radiology

    Health Physics

    (1995)
  • L.C. Fajardo et al.

    Dose response of a film for patient dosimetry in interventional radiology

    Medical Physics

    (1995)
  • FDA, 1994. FDA advisory: Avoidance of serious X-ray induced skin injuries to patients during fluoroscopically-guided...
  • FDA, 1995. Recording information in the patient's medical record that identifies the potential for serious...
  • Federal Register, 1991. November 6,...
  • V.M. Feygelman et al.

    Effective dose equivalents to patients undergoing cerebral angiography

    AJNR

    (1992)
  • R.A. Geise et al.

    Personnel exposure during fluoroscopy procedures

    Postgraduate Radiology

    (1988)
  • R.A. Geise et al.

    Exposure response of LOC4 film for patient dose estimates in interventional radiology

    Radiology

    (1995)
  • R.A. Geise et al.

    Radiation dosimetry during catheter ablation procedures

    Pacing and Cardiac Electrophysiology

    (1996)
  • Geise, R. A., Morin, R. L., 1996. Radiation management in interventional radiology. In Interventional Radiology, ed.,...
  • R.A. Geise et al.

    Suitability of laser stimulated TLD arrays as patient dose monitors in high dose X-ray imaging

    Medical Physics

    (1997)
  • Geise, R. A., Eubig, C., Franz, S. C., Kelsey, C. A., Lieto, R. P., Shaikh, N., Wexler, M., 1998. Managing the safe use...
  • W.R. Geiser et al.

    Effect of patient support pad on image quality and dose in fluoroscopy

    Medical Physics

    (1997)
  • N.A. Gkanatsios et al.

    Evaluation of an on-line patient exposure meter in neuroradiology

    Radiology

    (1997)
  • M.M. Goodsit et al.

    Evaluation of the angle dependence of measurements made with skin dose monitors

    Radiology

    (1997)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Task-based phantom evaluation of cardiac catheterization imaging modes

      2018, Physica Medica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cardiac catheterization procedures are now a worldwide standard of practice for cardiac diseases [1,2]. The involvement of X-ray imaging for these complex procedures is potentially associated with deterministic effects such as skin damage, hair loss and severe necrosis above specific dose thresholds [3–8]. In addition, as with any other use of X-rays, there is a stochastic risk for neoplasm formation that increases with increasing exposure [4].

    • Influence of exposure and geometric parameters on absorbed doses associated with common neuro-interventional procedures

      2017, Physica Medica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Various authorities such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [12], World Health Organization (WHO) [13], International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) [14] and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [15] have expressed concern over patients’ skin dose during interventional radiology procedures. Skin dose evaluation measurements have been categorized into two different technologies [16,17]: indirect measurement, in which patient’s skin dose is estimated with using exposure parameters; and direct measurement, in which skin dose is evaluated by placing a detector on or very close to the patient’s skin. So far different indirect dose metric parameters, like kerma-area product (KAP), fluoroscopy time and air-kerma at the interventional reference point have been established to evaluate patient’s skin dose during interventional procedures [17–19].

    • Surgeon education decreases radiation dose in complex endovascular procedures and improves patient safety

      2013, Journal of Vascular Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Radiation doses to patients from fluoroscopy will be lower when properly trained interventionalists operate the equipment. Outside of institutional fluoroscopy credentialing policies, little time is spent in formal education of physicians in radiation safety.37 This study demonstrates that directed education to vascular surgeons can lower PSD.

    • Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record for fluoroscopically guided procedures

      2012, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is desirable to measure PSD during interventional radiology procedures, but this has proved difficult in practice (46). PSD may be measured with real-time point-measurement devices applied to the patient (47–49), with thermoluminescent dosimeters applied to the patient, or with dosimetric film interposed between the x-ray beam and the patient (50–53). PSD data derived from point measurement devices are likely to underestimate true PSD unless the measurement device is placed at the exact site of PSD.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text