Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils
Introduction
Endovascular coiling for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms was introduced in the early nineties and this procedure has become an increasingly popular alternative to microsurgical clipping [1], [2]. However, the outcome of patients treated with platinum coils is not well established. Aneurysm regrowth or neck recurrence may be observed at follow-up [3].
Follow-up imaging is mandatory in order to detect aneurysmal regrowth and to determine the need for further therapy [3], [4]. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is considered as the reference method for treated aneurysm evaluation [4]. However, DSA is expensive, invasive, time-consuming, and carries a risk of complication [5]. To overcome the drawbacks associated with screening all patients with coiled aneurysms, accurate noninvasive imaging methods are of considerable value. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using a 3D time-of-flight (TOF) technique is considered as an alternative approach to DSA. At 1.5 Tesla (T), previous authors have reported the ability of this technique to detect aneurysm regrowth or neck recurrence [6], [7] but not small residual or recurrent aneurysm [6], [7].
The approximate doubling of signal-to-noise ratio from 1.5 T to 3 T can improve the spatial and contrast resolution of 3 T MRA [8]. The increased T1 times lead to gains in blood-to-background contrast at 3 T MRA [9]. Image quality appears to improve with TOF-MRA at 3 T compared with 1.5 T.
The purpose of this prospective study was to compare TOF-MRA at 3 T with DSA for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm occlusion after endovascular coiling and to determine whether TOF-MRA at 3 T can replace DSA in the imaging follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms.
Section snippets
Study design
To assess the value of TOF-MRA at 3 T for the evaluation of aneurysm occlusion following endovascular treatment with detachable coils, TOF-MRA and DSA were compared. DSA was considered as the reference technique. Patients were prospectively and consecutively included if they harbored intracranial aneurysms treated with coils and if a follow-up angiography was scheduled according to our usual follow-up protocol. Approval by the institutional review board of our hospital was not required because
Complications
Two complications (3.9%) were noted for two patients: one transient aphasia and one groin hematoma.
Image quality
Image quality was considered good, with minor artifacts (coils artifacts) in all but one case. Artifacts were considered major in one case: vessel overlapping was too great for aneurysm assessment. This DSA examination was considered as unreadable.
Artifactual occlusions of parent or branch vessels (partial overlapping of subtracted coils) were observed in seven cases (7/51).
DSA findings
Fifty angiograms were
Discussion
Our findings showed that TOF-MRA at 3 T is totally safe and feasible in the follow-up imaging of aneurysms treated with coils. Our results suggest that this technique is able to show neck or aneurysm permeability better than DSA.
Many authors have studied the role of noninvasive techniques in the necessary follow-up imaging of aneurysms treated with coils [6], [7], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. To our knowledge, only one study [7] has compared with few patients TOF-MRA at 3 T with DSA
Conclusion
This study showed that TOF-MRA at 3 T is a totally safe and valuable method for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. This technique is at least as efficient as DSA and possibly better than TOF-MRA at 1.5 T in the evaluation of flow in intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. In the light of these observations, we suggest that TOF-MRA at 3 T can replace DSA for the follow-up imaging of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coils.
References (20)
- et al.
International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries
Magn Reson Imaging
(2002) - et al.
Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils
J Neurosurg
(1992) - et al.
Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils
Stroke
(2003) - et al.
Recommendations for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Cerebrovascular Imaging of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology
Stroke
(2002) - et al.
Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients
Radiology
(2007) - et al.
Contribution of MR-angiography to the diagnosis and the therapeutic indication and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms
J Neuroradiol
(1994) - et al.
MR angiography at 3 T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
(2005) - et al.
High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0 T: technical considerations and initial experience
Magn Reson Med
(2001) - et al.
Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms
Stroke
(2001)