Detection of intracranial aneurysms using three-dimensional multidetector-row CT angiography: Is bone subtraction necessary?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of three-dimensional CT angiography (3D CTA) with bone subtraction in a comparison with 3D CTA without bone subtraction for the detection of intracranial aneurysms.

Materials and methods

Among 337 consecutive patients who had intracranial aneurysms detected on 3D CTA, 170 patients who underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were included in the study. CTA was performed with a 16-slice multidetector-row CT (MDCT) scanner. We created the 3D reconstruction images with and without bone subtraction by using the volume rendering technique. Three neuroradiologists in a blinded fashion interpreted both 3D CTA images with and without bone subtraction. The diagnostic accuracy of both techniques was evaluated using the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The sensitivity and positive predictive value were also evaluated.

Results

A total of 200 aneurysms (size: 2–23 mm) were detected in 170 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) for 3D CTA with bone subtraction (mean, Az = 0.933) was significantly higher than that for 3D CTA without bone subtraction (mean, Az = 0.879) for all observers (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of 3D CTA with bone subtraction for three observers was 90.0, 92.0 and 92.5%, respectively, while the sensitivity of 3D CTA without bone subtraction was 83.5, 83.5 and 87.5%, respectively. No significant difference in positive predictive value was observed between the two modalities.

Conclusions

3D CTA with bone subtraction showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for the detection of intracranial aneurysms as compared to 3D CTA without bone subtraction.

Introduction

Conventionally, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has been considered the reference standard for the detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) rotational angiography has provided an improved detection rate and characterization of intracranial aneurysms [1], [2]. Nevertheless, DSA has still several disadvantages, such as invasiveness, time-consumption, a relatively high cost and some neurological complications [3], [4]. Therefore, CT angiography (CTA) has been increasingly used and has become more important as a first diagnostic technique in patients with suspected intracranial aneurysms, especially for the evaluation of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in an emergency setting [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].

As CT technology has evolved and various subtraction and postprocessing techniques have been developed, subtraction CTA with good image quality for the detection of intracranial aneurysms has become possible [6], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. However, several problems, such as increased radiation dose due to a second scan, image degradation due to inevitable patient movement, venous contamination and bone artifacts still remain with the use of subtraction CTA [6], [11], [15]. There have been several reports on the potential usefulness of subtraction CTA, but most previously published studies have not included a large population and were concerned about evaluation of subtracted image quality or a comparison with DSA for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms [6], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of 3D CTA with bone subtraction in a comparison with 3D CTA without bone subtraction for the detection of intracranial aneurysms in a large patient population.

Section snippets

Patient population

Between November 2004 and March 2008, 337 consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysms detected on CTA were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 337 patients, 170 (73 men and 79 women; median age, 54.6 years; age range, 28–76 years) patients who underwent DSA, which was considered as the standard of reference, were included in the study. Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage was detected in 138 (81%) of the patients. The remaining 32 patients had various indications of CTA, including headache

Results

A total of 200 aneurysms were detected by the use of DSA in the 170 patients: 147 patients had 1 aneurysm, 19 patients had 2 aneurysms, 2 patients had 3 aneurysms, 1 patient had 4 aneurysms and 1 patient had 5 aneurysms. The location and number of aneurysms are summarized in Table 1. The size of the aneurysmal sac varied between 2 and 23 mm (mean size, 5.64 ± 3.14 mm).

For all 200 aneurysms, the calculated Az values for each observer for 3D CTA with bone subtraction and 3D CTA without bone

Discussion

Currently, CTA is widely used as an efficient imaging technique for the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms, especially in acutely ill patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, owing to rapid and easy performance. Moreover, the technological development of MDCT scanners has led to great improvement in the imaging quality of CTA and the detection rate of intracranial aneurysms [9], [10], [16], [17].

However, conventional CTA without bone subtraction may be less useful than DSA

Conclusions

In this study, 3D CTA with bone subtraction showed significantly better diagnostic accuracy for the detection of intracranial aneurysms as compared to 3D CTA without bone subtraction based on alternative free-response ROC analysis. Therefore, we recommend that 3D CTA with bone subtraction should be performed for the initial evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References (24)

  • B. Lubicz et al.

    Sixty-four-row multisection CT angiography for detection and evaluation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: interobserver and intertechnique reproducibility

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2007)
  • M. El Khaldi et al.

    Detection of cerebral aneurysms in nontraumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: role of multislice CT angiography in 130 consecutive patients

    Radiol Med (Torino)

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text