Morphological analysis of tumor cell/endothelial cell interactions under shear flow

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.001Get rights and content

Abstract

In the process of hematogenous cancer metastasis, tumor cells (TCs) must shed into the blood stream, survive in the blood circulation, migrate through the vascular endothelium (extravasation) and proliferate in the target organs. However, the precise mechanisms by which TCs penetrate the endothelial cell (EC) junctions remain one of the least understood aspects of TC extravasation. This question has generally been addressed under static conditions, despite the important role of flow induced mechanical stress on the circulating cell–endothelium interactions. Moreover, flow studies were generally focused on transient or firm adhesion steps of TC–EC interactions and did not consider TCs spreading or extravasation. In this paper, we used a parallel-plate flow chamber to investigate TC–EC interactions under flow conditions. An EC monolayer was cultured on the lower plate of the flow chamber to model the endothelial barrier. Circulating TCs were introduced into the flow channel under a well-defined flow field and TC cell shape changes on the EC monolayer were followed in vitro with live phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy. Two spreading patterns were observed: radial spreading which corresponds to TC extravasation, and axial spreading where TCs formed a mosaic TC–EC monolayer. By investigating the changes in area and minor/major aspect ratio, we have established a simple quantitative basis for comparing spreading modes under various shear stresses. Contrary to radial spreading, the extent of axial spreading was increased by shear stress.

Introduction

The major cause of death from cancer is metastatic dissemination (Tait et al., 2004), where tumor cells (TCs) locally invade and disseminate through the lymphatic system or blood circulation (Pantel and Brakenhoff, 2004). For hematogenous dissemination, TCs in the circulation must survive destruction by hemodynamic forces and host immune defenses, and then migrate out of the vessel through normal vascular endothelium (extravasation) in order to eventually proliferate in their target organs. TC extravasation plays a key role in tumor metastasis. However, the precise mechanisms by which TCs cross the endothelial cell (EC) junctions and how the presence of fluid shear forces modulates cellular responses remain poorly understood.

Leukocyte interactions with ECs have been extensively studied either under static conditions (Hashimoto et al., 2004) or under flow conditions (Carman and Springer, 2004; Cinamon et al., 2004; Kaplanski et al., 1998; Sheikh et al., 2005) and can serve as a model for interactions of circulating TCs with the vasculature (Takada et al., 1993). It is well known that shear flow has an effect on endothelial alignment and elongation (Dewey et al., 1981; Bruder et al., 2001), on cell cytoskeleton (Galbraith et al., 1998) and therefore on its local mechanical properties (Sato et al., 2000) and finally on mechanotransduction pathways (Li et al., 2005). However, TC–EC interactions have been generally addressed under static conditions in Boyden chambers (Hart et al., 2005; Li and Zhu, 1999; Roche et al., 2003) or on glass slides coated with Matrigel (Voura et al., 2001) or collagen (Longo et al., 2001).

Using a parallel-plate flow chamber, several authors have investigated the role of cell-surface molecules that mediate TC adhesion under flow conditions (Tözeren et al., 1995; Haier et al., 1999; Haier and Nicolson, 2000; Kitayama et al., 2000b; Burdick et al., 2003). However, these studies were focused on transient or firm adhesion steps of TC–EC interactions and did not consider TCs spreading or extravasation. Other studies showed the importance of actin and microtubule fibers reorganization in tumor cell adhesion (Korb et al., 2004), as well as mechanotransduction effects during metastatic adhesion of carcinoma cells, with a particular emphasis on the role of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) (Von Sengbusch et al., 2005).

More recently, Slattery et al. (2005) looked at leukocyte-facilitated TC extravasation and concluded that shear flow significantly reduced melanoma cell extravasation. In a companion paper (Dong et al., 2005), they also showed the role of Mac-1 and ICAM-1-mediated cell interactions with Polymorphonuclears (PMNs) in human melanoma cell transmigration. However, monitoring the whole process of extravasation with live microscopy was not possible with their flow-incorporated Boyden chamber.

In this study, we used a parallel-plate flow chamber to investigate TC–EC interactions under well-defined flow conditions. An EC monolayer was cultured on the lower plate of the flow chamber to model the endothelial barrier. Circulating TCs were introduced into the chamber and TC adhesion to ECs was followed in vitro with live phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy. TCs were distinguished from the EC monolayer by means of fluorescence labeling and their shape changes were quantified. The influence of various shear levels on TC spreading patterns was investigated.

Section snippets

Cells

ECs, obtained from human umbilical veins (HUVEC), and T24 TCs (bladder carcinoma cell line) were cultured as previously described (Roche et al., 2003). HUVECs (passage 2–6) were grown to confluence on a fibronectin-coated glass slide (20 μg/ml) for 3 days (37 °C, 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere).

T24 TCs were fluorescently labeled with the vital cytoplasmic dye calcein AM (7 μg/ml, Molecular Probes, USA).

Laminar flow chamber and flow assays

A parallel-plate flow chamber with a small height-to-width ratio (height h=140 μm, width b=14 mm,

In vitro model system for TC–EC interactions under shear flow

Just after the start-up of the flow, 30–50% of TCs that had settled down on the EC monolayer during the incubation period remained attached. Some of these cells rolled on the monolayer before detachment. Some others were directly located at an inter-endothelial junction where they attached firmly and began to spread. Others were located on the apical surface of an EC and had to move to an inter-endothelial junction before going through firm adhesion and spreading. Thus, time from initial TC–EC

Discussion

In this study, we have developed an in vitro model which allows live phase contrast and fluorescent visualization of TC spreading on an EC monolayer. We focused on TCs morphology as they interact with the EC monolayer under controlled flow levels.

The influence of shear flow on ECs and TCs has been studied by several authors: ECs elongate and reorient in the direction of flow (Dewey et al., 1981; Bruder et al., 2001). Their stress fibers and microtubules align in the direction of flow (Galbraith

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported partly by “La ligue contre le cancer” and the RTN project funded by the EU, Contract no CT- 2000-00105. We thank Alexeï Grichine for his assistance with the confocal microscope.

References (45)

  • N. Longo et al.

    Regulatory role of tetraspanin CD9 in tumor–endothelial cell interaction during transendothelial invasion of melanoma cells

    Blood

    (2001)
  • M. Sato et al.

    Local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for cultured bovine endothelial cells exposed to shear stress

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (2000)
  • K.L. Sung et al.

    Leukocyte relaxation properties

    Biophysical Journal

    (1988)
  • A. Von Sengbusch et al.

    Focal adhesion kinase regulates metastatic adhesion of carcinoma cells within liver sinusoids

    American Journal of Pathology

    (2005)
  • A.B. Al-Mehdi et al.

    Intravascular origin of metastasis from the proliferation of endothelium-attached tumor cells: a new model for metastasis

    Nature Medicine

    (2000)
  • J.L. Bruder et al.

    Induced cytoskeletal changes in bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells by resveratrol and accompanying modified responses to arterial shear stress

    BMC Cell Biology

    (2001)
  • M.M. Burdick et al.

    Colon carcinoma cell glycolipids, integrins, and other glycoproteins mediate adhesion to HUVECs under flow

    American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology

    (2003)
  • A.R. Burns et al.

    Neutrophil transendothelial migration is independent of tight junctions and occurs preferentially at tricellular corners

    Journal of Immunology

    (1997)
  • C.V. Carman et al.

    A transmigratory cup in leukocyte diapedesis both through vascular endothelial cells and between them

    Journal of Cell Biology

    (2004)
  • Y.S. Chang et al.

    Mosaic blood vessels in tumors: frequency of cancer cells in contact with flowing blood

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA

    (2000)
  • R. Chotard-Ghodsnia et al.

    A new flow chamber for the study of shear stress and transmural pressure upon cells adhering to a porous biomaterial

    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    (2002)
  • G. Cinamon et al.

    Chemoattractant signals and β2 occupancy at apical endothelial contacts combine with shear stress signals to promote transendothelial neutrophil migration

    Journal of Immunology

    (2004)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Mechanosensitivity of Cancer Cells in Contact with Soft Substrates Using AFM

      2018, Biophysical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore the investigation of cell mechanics has become a major issue and has led to the development of specific tools to study cell (visco)elasticity—such as optical tweezers, optical stretchers, microplates, micropipettes, magnetic twisting cytometry, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and microbead tracking with a laser or light—to investigate cell internal microrheological properties (1). Because of the variety of possible ways to investigate cell mechanics, different cell types have been tested; in particular, metastatic cancer cells have been studied extensively (2) and seem to become softer as they pass from blood through the endothelium (3) to invade new tissues (4). More precisely, E, the elastic Young modulus of cells, seems to decrease when cells become invasive as compared to normal ones (5–7).

    • Unraveling the Receptor-Ligand Interactions between Bladder Cancer Cells and the Endothelium Using AFM

      2017, Biophysical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      The adhesion and migration of leukocytes through the endothelium have been studied in detail during inflammation (3,6), but few results are available regarding the role of the key molecules involved in the adhesion and transmigration of cancer cells (6–11). The adhesion of cancer cells or leukocytes to endothelial cells (ECs) is an important step of the extravasation process and is mediated by several cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), including β1 integrins (12), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) (13), L-selectin (14), and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (6,7,15,16). We previously showed that ICAM-1 expressed by ECs is involved in the adhesion of bladder cancer cells (BCs) (6).

    • Effect of biomimetic shear stress on intracellular uptake and cell-killing efficiency of doxorubicin in a free and liposomal formulation

      2016, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Stress generated by interstitial and blood flows have been suggested to play key role in the metastatic process, by enhancing tumor cell invasion and promoting adhesion of circulating tumor cell to blood vessels, respectively (Roberts et al., 2007). Studies conducted with cultured cancer cells (e.g., colon, ovarian, bladder, esophageal, and melanoma) reported that mechanical stimuli such as pressure or fluid flow, affects cancer cells’ adhesion (Dong et al., 2005; Haier et al., 1999; Niedbala et al., 1985; Thamilselvan et al., 2004), migration (Slattery et al., 2005), expression of cadherin and integrin (Lawler et al., 2004), invasion capacity (Lawler et al., 2009), morphology (Chotard-Ghodsnia et al., 2007; Lawler et al., 2006), and viability (Haier and Nicolson, 2001). While these studies highlighted the importance of shear stress in the context of drug delivery, systematic assessment of drug cellular uptake and efficiency of drug delivery in epithelial cells have not been determined.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text