Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Letters to the Editor
Re: Pérez et al ‘Intracranial thrombectomy using the Solitaire stent: a historical vignette’
  1. Colin P Derdeyn
  1. Correspondence to Dr Colin P Derdeyn, Washington University, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110, USA; derdeync{at}wustl.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Pérez et al1 claim responsibility and primacy for the stent retriever concept, based on a case performed on 3 March 2008, and published in December 2011 in JNIS. The abstract conclusion states that this case, not published until 2011, was ‘the ignition spark for the development of a whole generation of new devices, now called stent retrievers’. In my experience, it is nearly always a mistake to claim to be first. This report is no exception, as the claim is clearly wrong. While this may have been the first use of the Solitaire stent for clot retrieval and perhaps the first case of clot capture and stent withdrawal, it was not the first time a stent designed for assisting aneurysm coiling was successfully used for acute stroke revascularization. Kelly et al partially deployed a self-expanding aneurysm-assist stent and achieved complete revascularization after reconstraining and removing the stent.2 This case was submitted for publication on 3 October 2007 and was published online on 3 April 2008. The report by Kelly et al provided much of the excitement and interest in using retrievable stents for acute stroke intervention.

References

Footnotes

  • Linked articles 010253.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • PostScript
    Marta Aguilar Pérez Elina Miloslavski Sebastian Fischer Hansjörg Bäzner Hans Henkes