Background Catheter size, location and circle of Willis anatomy impact the flow conditions during interventional stroke therapy. The aim of the study was to systematically investigate the influence of these factors on flow control in the middle cerebral artery by means of a computational model based on 100 patients with stroke who received endovascular treatment.

Methods The dimensions of the cervical and intracranial cerebral arteries of 100 patients who received endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke were measured and a three-dimensional model of the circle of Willis was created based on these data. Flow control in the middle cerebral artery with variations in catheter size, catheter location and configurations of collateral vessels was determined using a computational model. A total of 48 scenarios were analyzed.

Results Flow reversal with a distal aspiration catheter alone was not possible in the internal carotid artery and only sometimes possible in the middle cerebral artery (14 of 48 cases). The Catalyst 7 catheter was more often successful in achieving flow reversal than Catalyst 5 or 6 catheters (p<0.001). In a full circle of Willis anatomy, flow reversal was almost never possible. The absence of one or more communicating arteries significantly influenced flow direction compared with the full anatomy with all communicating arteries present (p=0.028).

Conclusion Choosing the biggest possible aspiration catheter and locating it in the middle cerebral artery significantly increases the chances of successful flow control. Flow through the collaterals may impair the flow, and circle of Willis anatomy should be considered during aspiration thrombectomy.