Article Text
Abstract
Background Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are useful in stroke prevention, their specific role in preventing stroke in hypertensive patients with intracranial aneurysms undergoing endovascular stent placement remains unclear.
Methods We retrospectively examined 458 hypertensive patients with intracranial aneurysms who underwent stent treatment, drawn from a larger multicenter cohort comprising 1326 patients across eight centers. Patients were dichotomized into two groups according to use of a CCB. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance group differences in patient and aneurysm characteristics. We conducted a comparison of patient and aneurysm characteristics, ischemic complications, and clinical outcomes between the two groups.
Results The CCB and non-CCB groups comprised 279 and 179 patients, respectively. PSM resulted in 165 matched pairs. After PSM, the incidence of ischemic events within 1 month of the procedure (4.2% vs 10.9%; P=0.022) and proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale score >2 at last follow-up (1.5% vs 7.8%; P=0.013) were significantly lower in the CCB group. Among patients treated with combination therapy, inclusion of a CCB was associated with a lower incidence of ischemic events (1.5% vs 13.3%; P=0.345), but the difference was not statistically significant after correction.
Conclusions CCB use in hypertensive patients undergoing endovascular stenting for treatment of intracranial aneurysms is associated with a lower incidence of ischemic events and a lower incidence of unfavorable neurological outcomes, especially when used in combination therapy.
- Aneurysm
- Stroke
- Stent
- Drug
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
QP and YZ contributed equally.
WL and SM contributed equally.
Contributors QP and YZhou collected most of the clinical data and wrote the manuscript. CW, XX, LD and YZhang helped to collect the clinical data. YZhang and BL reviewed the imaging data. HZ, JW, LL, PZ, YZhao, YW and FX critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. SM and WL designed the research, helped to revise the manuscript, and handled the funding and supervision. SM and WL are guarantors for the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 82371315), Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (grant number: 2022–1-2041), National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (grant number: GWJJ2022100104) and Summit Talent Program (grant number: DFL20220504).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.